PFN Impact · 2025 Season
NFL Wide Receiver Impact Rankings
Season
Week
| # | Details | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 96.3 | LA | 1,715 | 10 | 129 | 166 | 28.2% | 115.7 | +173.1 | 2.9 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 93.7 | SEA | 1,793 | 10 | 119 | 163 | 32.0% | 90.7 | +94.5 | 3.0 | 1 | ||
| 3 | 90.6 | DAL | 1,429 | 9 | 93 | 138 | 21.0% | 88.7 | +200.8 | 2.3 | 0 | ||
| 4 | 87.2 | DET | 1,401 | 11 | 117 | 172 | 27.7% | 55.6 | +40.3 | 3.0 | 0 | ||
| 5 | 86.5 | CIN | 1,412 | 8 | 125 | 185 | 28.9% | 41.4 | +163.6 | 3.2 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 83.2 | DET | 1,109 | 7 | 65 | 102 | 16.4% | 56.2 | +119.7 | 3.2 | 0 | ||
| 7 | 82.9 | NE | 1,013 | 4 | 85 | 102 | 18.5% | 70.4 | +71.9 | 3.0 | 0 | ||
| 8 | 81.0 | NO | 1,163 | 9 | 100 | 156 | 25.9% | 35.6 | -52.1 | 3.0 | 0 | ||
| 9 | 80.6 | BAL | 1,211 | 5 | 86 | 119 | 25.4% | 46.4 | +16.9 | 3.6 | 3 | ||
| 10 | 80.5 | HOU | 1,117 | 6 | 71 | 121 | 22.1% | 39.3 | +119.9 | 2.3 | 1 | ||
| 11 | 80.0 | PHI | 1,008 | 4 | 77 | 114 | 21.3% | 54.4 | -9.1 | 2.8 | 0 | ||
| 12 | 79.9 | PHI | 1,003 | 7 | 78 | 121 | 25.9% | 33.7 | +82.7 | 2.2 | 1 | ||
| 13 | 79.9 | IND | 1,003 | 6 | 47 | 84 | 16.4% | 55.8 | +60.0 | 2.1 | 0 | ||
| 14 | 79.7 | PIT | 850 | 6 | 59 | 99 | 20.1% | 32.9 | +165.5 | 2.6 | 0 | ||
| 15 | 79.6 | DEN | 1,017 | 7 | 74 | 125 | 19.5% | 45.6 | +8.5 | 2.3 | 0 | ||
| 16 | 79.0 | ATL | 919 | 7 | 68 | 113 | 28.0% | 24.8 | +43.8 | 2.7 | 1 | ||
| 17 | 79.0 | LA | 789 | 14 | 60 | 114 | 23.3% | 27.0 | -36.6 | 2.2 | 0 | ||
| 18 | 78.6 | CAR | 1,013 | 7 | 70 | 122 | 22.1% | 25.3 | +7.3 | 2.7 | 0 | ||
| 19 | 78.4 | MIA | 910 | 6 | 64 | 100 | 20.4% | 34.5 | +9.3 | 2.7 | 0 | ||
| 20 | 78.3 | NYG | 1,014 | 4 | 92 | 141 | 26.2% | 19.5 | +31.7 | 3.4 | 0 | ||
| 21 | 78.3 | DAL | 1,077 | 3 | 75 | 117 | 23.2% | 29.0 | +37.3 | 2.8 | 0 | ||
| 22 | 77.9 | CIN | 846 | 11 | 59 | 99 | 16.8% | 36.0 | +22.5 | 1.8 | 0 | ||
| 23 | 77.8 | ARI | 1,006 | 7 | 78 | 127 | 17.9% | 25.8 | +44.8 | 2.4 | 0 | ||
| 24 | 77.4 | IND | 793 | 7 | 80 | 114 | 19.6% | 22.3 | +33.7 | 3.0 | 0 | ||
| 25 | 77.3 | JAX | 847 | 5 | 58 | 97 | 17.8% | 29.7 | +100.3 | 2.4 | 0 | ||
| 26 | 77.0 | WAS | 727 | 5 | 72 | 100 | 21.1% | 17.6 | +78.4 | 3.5 | 0 | ||
| 27 | 77.0 | LAC | 777 | 4 | 81 | 122 | 19.4% | 34.9 | +25.4 | 2.6 | 0 | ||
| 28 | 76.3 | KC | 571 | 5 | 53 | 79 | 24.7% | 16.0 | +32.7 | 3.6 | 0 | ||
| 29 | 76.3 | GB | 724 | 6 | 55 | 86 | 17.0% | 34.6 | +19.9 | 2.3 | 0 | ||
| 30 | 75.9 | CHI | 661 | 6 | 44 | 91 | 21.5% | 20.9 | +42.9 | 3.0 | 1 | ||
| 31 | 75.7 | CHI | 652 | 2 | 47 | 60 | 11.4% | 30.1 | +43.6 | 4.6 | 0 | ||
| 32 | 75.5 | LAC | 789 | 6 | 66 | 106 | 18.2% | 7.2 | +66.6 | 3.3 | 0 | ||
| 33 | 75.4 | TB | 938 | 6 | 63 | 128 | 21.3% | 7.1 | +42.9 | 2.6 | 0 | ||
| 34 | 75.3 | BUF | 686 | 4 | 72 | 97 | 18.9% | 7.5 | +135.6 | 3.8 | 1 | ||
| 35 | 75.3 | LV | 696 | 5 | 57 | 92 | 15.8% | 21.8 | +13.2 | 3.6 | 0 | ||
| 36 | 75.1 | LAC | 735 | 8 | 51 | 84 | 17.4% | 23.9 | +38.3 | 2.4 | 1 | ||
| 37 | 75.0 | GB | 611 | 6 | 35 | 55 | 17.2% | 32.3 | +26.1 | 2.0 | 0 | ||
| 38 | 75.0 | MIN | 1,048 | 2 | 84 | 142 | 25.9% | -13.8 | +65.4 | 3.2 | 0 | ||
| 39 | 74.7 | WAS | 582 | 3 | 38 | 60 | 19.6% | 31.8 | +3.2 | 2.4 | 0 | ||
| 40 | 74.2 | CHI | 667 | 6 | 50 | 85 | 14.1% | 13.6 | +30.5 | 3.3 | 0 | ||
| 41 | 73.8 | JAX | 835 | 3 | 75 | 110 | 20.4% | 10.0 | +25.1 | 2.7 | 1 | ||
| 42 | 73.7 | ARI | 608 | 4 | 41 | 74 | 15.8% | 31.1 | +26.1 | 2.4 | 1 | ||
| 43 | 73.4 | DAL | 475 | 4 | 40 | 56 | 11.3% | 28.6 | +26.1 | 3.0 | 0 | ||
| 44 | 73.2 | DEN | 709 | 6 | 65 | 107 | 16.7% | 9.8 | +19.3 | 3.0 | 1 | ||
| 45 | 73.1 | JAX | 707 | 2 | 48 | 91 | 17.4% | 17.2 | +12.1 | 2.7 | 0 | ||
| 46 | 73.0 | KC | 587 | 5 | 49 | 74 | 12.4% | 22.4 | -29.3 | 3.2 | 0 | ||
| 47 | 72.7 | NYJ | 395 | 4 | 36 | 60 | 28.3% | -2.1 | -1.0 | 3.1 | 0 | ||
| 48 | 72.6 | SF | 643 | 9 | 55 | 93 | 18.1% | -2.3 | +39.1 | 2.2 | 1 | ||
| 49 | 72.3 | NE | 550 | 2 | 46 | 65 | 13.9% | 27.2 | -12.1 | 2.7 | 0 | ||
| 50 | 72.1 | MIN | 610 | 3 | 42 | 79 | 16.8% | 14.0 | +26.3 | 2.9 | 1 |
1–50 of 78
Page 1 of 2
How Wide Receiver Impact is scored — Blends receiving value over replacement, yards, TDs and target share with Next Gen separation and yards-after-catch over expected into a 50–100 grade.
Era-adjusted WR Impact grade (50–100); average qualifying receiver = 75. Separation & YAC-over-expected (Next Gen Stats) aren't tracked before 2016. Toggle Compare to overlay two WRs' weekly grades. Full methodology →