“Rams are gonna regret this.” That’s the buzz echoing across NFL Twitter as fans sound off on Sean McVay’s latest headache: the Matthew Stafford contract saga. The Super Bowl-winning QB is locked in a standoff, and rumors of him walking away are heating up pretty fast.
Now, with tensions rising and McVay playing it cool (for now), fans are convinced letting Stafford go would be a colossal mistake.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e859c/e859c2a63d49218197cee7c3351cda9262a07827" alt="Pro Football Network Mock Draft Simulator"
Matthew Stafford on the Trade Block?
The Stafford drama just hit a boiling point. The Los Angeles Rams have officially given Stafford’s agent permission to explore trade talks, according to Tom Pelissero. Now, NFL fans aren’t holding back, and if the reactions say anything, McVay might be playing with fire.
One fan didn’t mince words: “Rams are gonna regret this.” That’s the gut-punch reaction echoing through NFL circles. After all, Stafford brought L.A. its first Lombardi since their return to the city. Ditching him now feels like a risky gamble.
Rams are gonna regret this
— NBA Hoops Online (@NBABoards) February 22, 2025
Another fan threw out a question the Rams’ front office should be asking themselves: “Would trading him be the right move or should the Rams run it back?”
With Stafford still delivering solid stats (3,762 yards and 20 touchdowns last year), walking away could leave a huge gap under center.
Would trading him be the right move, or should the Rams run it back with him?
— Deepika (@DeepikaaMurugan) February 22, 2025
But some fans are already picturing Stafford in silver and black: “Stafford to the Raiders, I’m calling it right now.” Vegas does need stability at QB, and Stafford’s veteran presence could fit like a glove.
Then comes the money talk: “He’s about to make A LOT of money somewhere.” Well, yes – Stafford’s next deal could shake up the market, especially with his Super Bowl pedigree.
One fan, likely speaking for L.A. realists, said, “They need a 2-year rental at QB if they’re moving on.” Fair point: if Stafford’s gone, the Rams need a bridge to their next franchise leader.
Finally, an Eagles fan couldn’t help but joke: “They are the Eagles’ biggest threat… trade him!” Hey, if rivals are rooting for your mistakes, maybe it’s time to reconsider.
For now, Stafford’s future hangs in limbo, and McVay better hope fans aren’t right.
Stafford’s Future Hangs on Contract Talks, Not Trade Drama
Despite the noise, the Rams aren’t rushing to hit the reset button at quarterback just yet. Stafford isn’t forcing his way out, either. The real challenge? Crafting a new contract that works for both sides.
Stafford gave up most of his 2025 guarantees after last year’s restructuring, effectively turning his deal into a year-to-year setup. According to ESPN’s Adam Schefter, both Stafford and the Rams still want to reach an agreement to keep him in L.A. long-term.
But as Schefter pointed out, “It’s up to those two sides to figure out a number that the Rams can live with that Matthew Stafford is more comfortable with that would enable him to continue and finish his NFL career with the Rams. That’s the goal, I believe, of both sides. Now, that could change very quickly.”
If talks stall, trade discussions could get serious. For now, Stafford’s camp is testing the waters, gauging his market value with other teams. “If there were a trade, what would the numbers be elsewhere?” reported Tom Pelissero on The Rich Eisen Show.
Any team aiming for Stafford would likely need to cough up a first-round pick, according to Fox Sports’ Jordan Schultz. With just $4 million in guaranteed money left, Stafford’s next deal will need serious financial muscle. Still, if the Rams get this wrong, fans might be right – they will regret it.