What’s begun in California has traction
Ultimately, the measure signed into law by Newsom is a tremendous step toward defeating all of the things the NCAA has been criticized for. The sluggish movement for improvements, the constant resistance against giving athletes a piece of the revenue pie, and the seemingly strong stance they make, even calling SB 206 “unconstitutional” – these are all things that support the measure and will help lean public support at the minimum.
Realistically, the NCAA cannot remove the public institutions of California from their competitive tournaments and championships. How could they remove California Berkley, UCLA, Southern California or even Stanford from the competition? That would be a tremendous loss competitively, removing legitimacy from those lifting trophies at the end of seasons. It would take away revenue and top-end prospects from the greater picture when they’re enticed to sign with California programs.
Additionally, this could set the precedent for other states to implement the law, creating the exact same logistical changes on an even greater scale. While the universities weren’t supportive of the measure themselves, therefore suggesting it will go to court, the truth is that the colleges do not need the NCAA as much as the NCAA needs the colleges. If push comes to shove, the schools may side with their student’s happiness. Throw in a bunch of other states, and the NCAA as we know it may cease to exist. The domino effect from the O’Bannon case will have come full circle.
Felix Davila is an editor & contributor for PFN leading NFL Draft writers. You can follow him @DavilaFootball on Twitter.